Thanks for visiting and commenting.

I would not consider you a whack-job Francis simply because you:

1) Managed to write a coherent comment without the use of religious phraseology.

2) Expressed a view that , while the church is important to you, you understand that there is a legitimate secular world out here.

3) Didn’t try to shove your religion down my throat

In your example, yes I would. Why? Because you gave me no other choice. I know only 2 things about this President, he holds the office and he is religious. Given that I would also have to assume that he takes a leak in the morning because of his religion.

PBob, I would vote not FOR Hillary! but AGAINST Huck. I have looked at the Libertarian Party and even voted that way a number of times, but like it or not this is a 2 party system and the only vote to keep Huck out of office is to vote for the evil of 2 lessors.

As far as the accuracy of the story-dont know. I can see some avenues of research that could lead to doubt, but dont have any desire to go there. Huckabee tho needs to clearly answer the accusations and put it to bed if he wants to move forward.

Now, imagine that a president were to issue a commutation or a pardon to someone you disapprove, or under circumstances you disapprove. Imagine further that he thereafter declined to discuss his reasons for it. You know him to be a religious man, and you know that his faith prescribes forgiveness for the repentant. Would you ascribe his decision to his “whack-jobbedness?” If so, why? If not, why not?

“In the bowels of Christ, think that ye may be mistaken!” — Olive Cromwell, addressing Parliament.

Would you like to do a Link Exchange with THE INTERNET RADIO NETWORK? At the IRN you can listen for free to over 50 of America’s top Talk Shows via Free Streaming Audio…

http://netradionetwork.com